Saturday, July 31, 2004
I recommend this Journal for one simple reason - that the journal always has a wonderful collection of articles from people in very different areas with very different viewpoints. The journal has previsouly focused on issues such as Learning, Science, International Justice, Beauty etc.
p.s. While browsing their website, I realised that Senator Paul Sarbanes (of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act) has recently been elected into the Academy. Comments?
In Europe, the poor and those on the left of the political spectrum are unhappy about inequality; whereas in the US the happiness of the poor and of those on the left is uncorrelated with inequality. Interestingly, in the US, the rich are bothered by inequality. Comparing across continents, we find that left-wingers in Europe are more hurt by inequality than left-wingers in the US.
The authors conclude that this is consistent with
the perception (not necessarily the reality) that Americans have of living in a mobile society, where individual effort can move people up and down the income ladder, while Europeans believe that they live in less mobile societies.
If the goal of public policy is to make people happier, perhaps one should consciously change (and pay attention to) societal perceptions of success. Not surprisingly, cultures that view effort and talent more important for success than birth, religion, caste and corruption are likely to be happier.
If the Indian economy grows 8 percent annually, and if Indian households mimic their Chinese counterparts' propensity to own cars relative to incomes, then in a short span of four years India's car market may more than double to rival China's 2003 total of 1.76 million units. In the worst-case scenario -- in which the $575 billion economy expands no more than 6 percent a year, and Indians are more reluctant than the Chinese to splurge on new cars - it will still take only eight years before India becomes the world's fourth-biggest passenger-car market after the U.S., Japan and China.
Telecommunications will be the other industry to watch. Morgan Stanley's best-case estimate is for India to reach China's current level of 295 million fixed-line phones in seven years, up from 46.5 million subscribers at present.
Chetan Ahya and Andy Xie of Morgan Stanley dont paint an entirely rosy picture though.
While India's economy did grow 8 percent last year, there's reason to doubt if that's a sustainable rate for the country that has since 1990 attracted less than 7 percent as much in foreign direct investment as the $480 billion that has poured into China. Besides, India saves only 24 percent of its gross domestic product, compared with a 39 percent savings rate in the most- populous nation -- another reason for India's growth aspirations to remain shrouded by lack of capital.
Almost three-fifths of the power India generates yields no revenue because of theft and distribution of free electricity to farmers. That means industrial power users pay rates that are among the highest in the world, and are double of Chinese levels. That's a big drag on India's export competitiveness.
High customs tariffs in India, amounting to 15 percent of the value of goods imported into the country, curb consumption. In China, where tariffs are only 3 percent of the value of imports, Consumer durables are a third cheaper than in India.
India's labor productivity in manufacturing industries is in disarray because of the country's neglect of basic education. In an eight-hour shift, a Chinese worker produces 35 shirts. An Indian worker manages 20.
Let me make a few quick points about the car market. Until very recently, India sold more cars than China did. The meteoric rise of China's car market is a post-1999 phenomenon. I don't know for sure what the reasons are, but I suspect it may have to do with taxation as much as it does with better transportation infrastructure. The state of roads are a no-brainer. China has much better roads than India does. Tax structures are something the Indian govt could do something about. I think the cost of cars can be brought down dramatically if taxes are brought down and increased competition is encouraged. After all, this is how the mobile phone market took off. Of course, given the current state of tranportation infrastructure in India, it's a valid question to ask whether we really need any more cars on the road.
PS: You can find a more detailed version of the MS report here.
Geopolitics is much the same. American neoconservatives such as Robert Kagan look down upon feminine, Venus-like Europeans, gibing their narcissistic obsession with building a postmodern, bureaucratic paradise. The United States, by contrast, supposedly carries the mantle of masculine Mars, boldly imposing freedom in the world's nastiest neighborhoods. But by cleverly deploying both its hard power and its sensitive side, the European Union (EU) has become more effective - and more attractive - than the United States on the catwalk of diplomatic clout. Meet the real New Europe: the world's first metrosexual superpower.
Metrosexuals always know how to dress for the occasion (or mission). Spreading peace across Eurasia serves U.S. interests, but it's best done by donning Armani pinstripes rather than U.S. Army fatigues. After the fall of Soviet communism, conservative U.S. thinkers feared a united Germany vying with Russia for hegemony in Central Europe. Yet, by brandishing only a slick portfolio of economic incentives, the EU has incorporated many of the former Soviet republics and satellites in the Baltics and Eastern Europe. Even Turkey is freshening up with eau d'Europe. Ankara resisted Washington's pressure to provide base rights for the invasion of Iraq in 2003. But to get backstage in Brussels, it has had to smooth out its more unseemly blemishesabolishing the death penalty, taking steps to resolve the Cyprus dispute, and introducing laws to protect its Kurdish minority.
Metrosexuals may spend a long time standing in front of the mirror, but they never shop alone. Stripping off stale national sovereignty (that's so last century), Europeans now parade their "pooled power," the new look for this geopolitical season. As a political, economic, and military union with some 450 million citizens, a $9 trillion economy, and armies surpassing 1.6 million soldiers, Europe is now a whole greater than the sum of its parts.
Friday, July 30, 2004
Bloggers - more than three dozen of them - won press credentials for the first time, and they quickly made their presence known. On Tuesday, Dave Winer of the blog Scripting News ventured down to the convention floor from the cheap seats known as Blogger Row and was buttonholed for interviews by ABC News, CNN and Fox. Dave Pell said that page views of his Electablog jumped at least sixfold, to 30,000 to 40,000 a day.
Meanwhile, the traditional news media chewed over what the arrival of online commentators - mostly untrained journalists whose stock in trade is the sharp opinion, often quippy - meant to the political process. "Obviously, the official media don't quite know how to deport themselves in relation to the blogs," said Orville Schell, dean of the graduate journalism program at the University of California, Berkeley. "If they adopt them, it's like having a spastic arm - they can't control it. But if they don't adopt it, they're missing out on the newest, edgiest trend in the media."
The weavers of the holy city, home to the world-famous Banarasi saris, have made the contraceptives a vital part of garment production. The weaver rubs the condom on the loom's shuttle, which is softened by the lubricant thus making the process of weaving faster. The lubricant does not leave any stain on the silk thread which might soil the valuable saris. There are around 150,000 to 200,000 hand and power looms in Varanasi alone and almost all are using the technique. And every loom has a daily consumption of three or four condoms. At first, weavers stocked up on condoms from the family planning department under a government scheme to provide them free of cost. Some weavers even registered with fake identities to get their hands on the precious prophylactics.
Other uses of the prophylatic?
Villagers use them to carry water when working in fields
For waterproofing ceilings: condoms are spread under the cement-concrete mortar
Can be mixed with tar and concrete to give a smooth finish to roads
Can be placed over the ends of guns to protect them in desert sandstorms
Drugs 'mules' swallow condoms filled with drugs to smuggle them across borders
I guess the next time the Indian govt trots out data on increased condom usage, one has every reason to be mighty suspicious.
Thursday, July 29, 2004
A lot of people wonder what happened to J. Craig Venter, the maverick biologist who a few years ago raced the US government to sequence the human genetic code. Well, you've found him. His pate is sunburned, and the beard is new since he graced the covers of Time and BusinessWeek. It makes him look younger and more relaxed - not that I ever saw him looking very tense, even when the genome race got ugly and his enemies were closing in. This afternoon, the only adversary he has to contend with is the occasional no-see-um nipping at some tender body part. "Nobody out here has ever heard of the human genome," he told me a week ago, when I first joined him in French Polynesia. "It's great."
Venter is here not just to enjoy himself, though he has been doing plenty of that. What separates him from your average 58-year-old nude beachcomber is that he's in the midst of a scientific enterprise as ambitious as anything he's ever done. Leaving colleagues and rivals to comb through the finished human code in search of individual genes, he has decided to sequence the genome of Mother Earth.
What we think of as life on this planet is only the surface layer of a vast undiscovered world. The great majority of Earth's species are bacteria and other microorganisms. They form the bottom of the food chain and orchestrate the cycling of carbon, nitrogen, and other nutrients through the ecosystem. They are the dark matter of life. They may also hold the key to generating a near-infinite amount of energy, developing powerful pharmaceuticals, and cleaning up the ecological messes our species has made. But we don't really know what they can do, because we don't even know what they are.
MK Shankaralinge Gowda, secretary of IT and biotechnology for the state government of Karnataka, said that the number of tech workers in the region will exceed 200,000 between 2004 and 2005, as IT and business process outsourcing companies continue to rapidly hire workers.
The 175,100 figure may not capture all the tech-related jobs in Santa Clara County. Some technology positions may show up in other statistical categories, such as employment services. For example, employment services would include an employment agency that might send programmers to work on a temporary basis for other companies.
Is this bad news for Silicon Valley? Not really.
Ruth Kavanagh, peninsula labor market consultant for Santa Clara County at the EDD, said that despite the Bangalore claim, Silicon Valley is experiencing employment growth levels similar to those in boom years.
"In recent months, we have seen significant improvement in the jobs situation. Between May and June [including non-tech jobs], we had growth rates very similar to those in 1998 and 1999. The county is gradually gaining back some of the thousands of jobs lost in the last couple of years," she said. Kavanagh suggested the impact of offshoring may be overstated, referring to a separate report by the nonprofit Joint Venture: Silicon Valley Network earlier this month.The shift of work to lower-wage countries is just one of a number of global forces affecting job creation and loss in the region, according to that organization's report.
In addition, Angry Bear has some data on starting salaries in tech-related industries. CS majors are up almost 5 per cent, while information sciences are up in excess of 8 per cent. Perhaps, the hoopla over outsourcing was a little overblown?
PS: As far as technology goes, I think this is a fairly narrow definition of technology thats being used. So, if one were to include technologies like bio-technology, nano-technology etc, I wonder what the employment numbers would look like. Is there as much bio-tech activity in Santa Clara as in Bangalore, for example?
Europe, the standard criticism goes, has not matched the American expansion for most of the last decade and has even fallen behind Japan in recent quarters. Its citizens are on average almost 30 percent poorer than their counterparts on the other side of the Atlantic, according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, a group of 30 countries committed to democracy and the market economy. Potential growth in the next decade risks being stuck at 2 percent - one percentage point below that of the United States.
Some economists and European officials argue that, rather than reflecting a failure to catch up with its more industrious competitors because of faltering productivity growth, Europe's more modest income level mainly reflects policy choices that have tended to put a premium on leisure and equality at the expense of greater wealth.
Over the last half century, Western Europeans have gradually opted to work less and take longer vacations. They have put in place varying national versions of public universal health care, education and retirement benefits. They have set up a complex web of minimum income legislation, including unemployment subsidies and disability benefits, and basic social welfare, in an effort to limit the risk of destitution.
"The welfare state is an efficiency device against market failure,'' said Nicholas Barr, a professor of public economics at the London School of Economics. "It's a perfectly rational policy to accept lower output for higher welfare.''Or as Joaquín Almunia, European commissioner for economic and monetary affairs, put it, for Europeans, economic growth is a tool, not an end in itself. "We are not in a race with the U.S.,'' he said. "Our goal is not to grow as fast as the U.S. or anybody else, but to do what we need to protect our economic and social model.''
Some economists say Europe's social model is costing it dearly. In a society that prides itself on egalitarian values, too many people are unemployed or outside the labor market, doubly raiding public coffers by not paying taxes and often receiving benefits at the same time. The jobless rate in the European Union's 15 old members rose to 7.8 percent last year, compared with 6.1 percent in the United States, said the OECD. With a growing number of retirees, joblessness is increasingly straining the continent's state-financed pension and health systems: the combined burden is forecast to rise to as much as 8 percent of gross domestic product in most European Union member nations, the European Commission estimates.
A generous welfare state does not only have costs. Europe has less child poverty, a lower incidence of illiteracy and a smaller prison population than the United States, OECD statistics show. Europeans have a slightly higher life expectancy and can hope to spend more of their old age in good health than Americans.
Ultimately, is economic growth about individuals being happier (as a result of economic growth, increased incomes etc) or is economic growth good in and of itself?
According to surveys by the World Database of Happiness, which is run by Prof. Ruut Veenhoven at Erasmus University in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, residents in many European nations are more satisfied with their lives than Americans and residents in more hard-working nations, like Japan, where people have been clocking even more hours than in the United States. More significantly, measures of happiness in the America and Japan has been flat over the last 30 years, while they have been rising in most Western European countries.
A small band of development economists, who a year ago founded the Poverty Action Lab at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, have become influential advocates for randomized evaluations as the best way to answer that question. Such trials, generally regarded as the gold standard in social policy research, involve randomly assigning people eligible for an antipoverty program to get the help or not, then comparing outcomes to see whether those who got the help fared better than those who did not.
It is the same approach that has helped drug companies figure out what medicines are effective and Americans decide how best to reform welfare. Advocates for rigorous evaluations hope to make aid more effective, not by directing money to particular countries, but by spending it on programs proven to work.
Adding an extra teacher to classrooms in rural India did not improve children's test scores. But hiring high-school graduates who were paid only $10 to $15 a month to give remedial tutoring to groups of lagging students in a Bombay slum markedly improved reading and math skills. A series of education experiments in Kenya found that providing poor students with free uniforms or a simple porridge breakfast substantially increased attendance. But giving them drugs to treat the intestinal worms that infect more than a quarter of the world's population was more cost effective, with a price tag of only $3.50 for each extra year of schooling achieved. Healthier children are more likely to go to school. "You can't answer the general question: Does aid work?'' said Esther Duflo, an economist and co-founder of the Poverty Action Lab."You have to go project by project and accumulate the evidence.''
The World Bank, a lumbering giant that employs more than 1,200 Ph.D.'s, is beginning to listen to critics like her. This summer, it is organizing large-scale impact evaluations, including randomized trials, of programs to upgrade slums, improve the performance of schools and keep children healthy and in class. The programs will be tested in dozens of countries.
Rigorous impact evaluations should become part of the bank's culture, he said.That will require deep change. A recent in-house review of bank projects during the past four to five years found that only 2 percent had been properly evaluated for whether they made a difference, according to Mr. Bourguignon.
Wednesday, July 28, 2004
Tuesday, July 27, 2004
Drawn by a booming economy, in which outsourcing is playing a crucial role, and the money to buy the lifestyle they had in America, Indians are returning in large numbers, many to this high-technology hub.What began as a trickle in the late 1990's is now substantial enough to be talked about as a "reverse brain drain.'' By one estimate, there are 35,000 "returned nonresident Indians'' in Bangalore, with many more scattered across India.
For this still developing country, the implications of the reverse migration are potentially vast.For decades, it has watched many of its best-educated move abroad, never to come back. Now a small portion of that talent is returning, their influence amplified beyond their numbers by their high-level skills and education, new cultural perspective and, in many cases, ample wealth. They are both staffing and starting companies, 110 of which set up shop in Bangalore in just the year that ended in March. In some cases, they are seeking to refashion India implicitly in America's image. It takes leaving and returning, said Arjun Kalyanpur, a radiologist who returned in 1999, to ask, "Why should my country be any less than the country I was in?"
Where Indian parents have long worried about how to give their children sufficient exposure to the English language and Western culture, many returnees say they worry more about how to connect their children to India. The returnees describe identities in flux, riddled with continuing questions about what to cook, what holidays to celebrate, what languages to speak, and how to interact with a country that sometimes seems as foreign as the United States once did.
Monday, July 26, 2004
From the Economist...
Founded in 1968, TCS has long been a leader in the development of India's booming information technology (IT) industry. Indeed, it now claims to be Asia's largest IT company, with sales in the latest financial year of $1.5 billion and 28,000 employees of 30 nationalities working in 32 countries. They seem to like working for TCS: it has an unusually low (by Indian standards) employee attrition rate of about 6.5% a year. It pioneered offshore operations when it began working in America in 1973 and now offers services to firms spanning insurance, telecoms, retail and transport.
With clear advantages to be gained from going public, analysts have frequently questioned why Mr Tata did not take the plunge earlier—especially during the late 1990s software boom when the firm's sales were growing at nearly 60% a year, twice the current rate. One concern was that flotation would upset the balance of the group: TCS's expected market capitalisation will be nearly four times that of Tata Motors, one of Tata's leading five companies. But, with the benefit of hindsight, Ishaat Hussain, Tata's finance director, rationalises the delay: Indian tax reforms since the late 1990s have halved the corporation tax that the group must pay on the float and eliminated gift tax. The timing also fits in with Mr Tata's new focus on international expansion.
Now, the motives for TCS's IPO are something I have wondered about. Clearly, Tata Sons gains to benefit from TCS's float. They raise over a billion dollars which they can invest in the cash-gobbling telecom business and for their international expansion plans. What does TCS gain in the bargain? Of course, the other way to look at it is that TCS is finally answerable to its shareholders and if Tata Sons owns most of TCS, then maybe it all makes sense.
From Business Week...
The group's revenues are up 30% since 2002, to $12.8 billion last year, and profits have grown 60%, to $1.2 billion. Stock prices of the group's biggest publicly traded companies, Tata Motors and Tata Steel, have tripled in that period. And this summer, Tata is expected to raise $1.2 billion by selling 13% of Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), Asia's largest software-services player
Ratan Tata isn't satisfied: He wants the world -- not just India -- to embrace Tata products. So for the past four years he has been in global expansion mode. In 2000, Tata Tea Ltd. paid $435 million for Britain's Tetley Tea, a company three times its size, to gain a ready-made international brand. In March, Tata bought Daewoo's commercial truck operation for $102 million, with the idea of using Daewoo technology for his truckmaking operation and establishing a springboard into other Asian markets. In Britain, MG Rover Group Ltd. is selling Tata-built Indica compact cars under its own brand name, while Tata trucks ply roads from Malaysia to South Africa. The lodging division is expanding into luxury and business hotels around the world. And TCS is looking to buy software houses in North and South America.
BW also sheds some light on Tata's social conscience....
The frenetic activity represents a big change of pace for the old-world Tata group. Although the conglomerate has always been run by a Tata, family members own only a tiny stake in Tata Sons, the holding company that controls the group's ownership in the various enterprises. Instead, Tata Sons is run by a pair of trusts that get dividends from the group's operations. That money is deployed for social services such as education grants and health care for the poor. Very little wends its way back into the pockets of Tata family members.
PS: Tata is also strongly rumoured to be placing a $200 million bid for Tyco Global Network's assets.
Businessworld is carrying an interview with C.K.Prahlad to coincide with the launch of the IndiOne brand. In it, he shares some of the ideas that led to the launch of the brand.
Indian Hotels had hotels that had rooms costing Rs 2,500-3,500 a night. Those were not really low-cost rooms by Indian standards. So, there was always a feeling inside the company that they have not done enough. We did a lot of research by finding out the travel budgets of managers and sales executives in medium-sized companies. The results told us that we needed to offer rooms [at] much lower [prices] than what Indian Hotels had earlier offered. We also found that budget hotels internationally costed about a fifth of the luxury hotels.
We expect to be profitable in the first year itself. Just like our pricing, our margins are also very aggressive - far more than Indian Hotels will make from its luxury project. But there is a catch. The whole idea has been devised under certain strict parameters of cost and design. The success of the project will therefore hinge on how much the management is able to run the business within these parameters. For example, there will be no concept of discounts in this model. How much the sales manager can hold in a slack season and what innovative ways he uses to sell the rooms will make the difference.
The indiOne effort can be thought of as a unique idea for not just Indian Hotels but the whole industry. This represents an important innovation from India in a traditional industry. Also, the ground-up effort by an existing management to execute a complete different model should serve as a unique learning experience in business.
In an era when the American military increasingly finds itself in situations where civilians and combatants can be difficult to distinguish between, and when the line between soldiering and policy (sic) has blurred, nonlethal weapons could prove useful.
As an example...
Imagine the plight of a soldier guarding a crucial road or a checkpoint in a war zone who sees a truck barreling toward him. The driver fails to heed his calls to stop. Does the soldier let the truck keep coming and risk a possible suicide bombing? Or does he shoot and, as more than one American soldier in Iraq has belatedly realized, kill an innocent driver or even an entire family who bore no ill will but simply didn't understand his warnings?
While some potentially lethal weapons are labeled non-lethal, such nonkiller weapons might be especially useful in communal riots. It could drastically reduce the 'snowball' effect. In a country such as India, where the riots can sprout from a local neighbourhood to engulf large regions, the potential losses avoided could be high. This might make investments in such weapons economically feasible as well. As far as the definition goes, I only hope there is more atention paid to the reversibility of the damage done. That would make non-lethal really non-lethal.
In his letter to Arun Shourie, Rajesh Jain mentions server-based computing, open-source software and free hardware as part of the solution. His letter is worth a read.
1. Develop a 5-year vision for India's IT and Telecom Infrastructure
2. Promote use of server-based computing and open-source software platforms
3. Remove Anti-dumping duty on import of old PCs
4. Standardise Indian language computing efforts
5. Provide a level-playing field for alternative hardware and software solutions
6. Open up the wireless spectrum
7. Change the way we fund Research in India
8. Start a Weblog
FREE SOFTWARE As OpenOffice, Linux and other free software move towards feature-complete product sets, I am moving to a model where I run Linux most of the time, and use Windows only on occassion. That seems to be a good long-term model that tackles the issues of excessive system maintenance, frequent reboots, increasing memory requirements and frequent security updates - problems that have plagued Windows for many years, and ones that I don't see being solved any time soon. I am reasonably tech-dependent, but I haven't yet gotten into a situation where I need an application that I can't get for free on Linux, or on my old version of Windows (I have a copy of Windows XP sitting in a little booklet by the side of my computer. I could upgrade any time I want, but I have simply decided not to). I would think that OpenOffice, Linux and a few other pieces of software alone would prove to be tremendously useful in bringing the computer to the masses .
OPEN SOURCE AND OPEN CONTENT There is no commercial market for Microsoft Windows, Microsoft Word or other application software in developing countries, but there is huge demand in terms of the number of people who want to benefit from software and technology. A way I see Microsoft succeeding in a market like India is by proprietarizing content and creating unportable (or unportworthy) applications on their platform for the Indian market, thereby preventing the emergence of free or other low-solutions. This is a strategy that they have executed well in the past, and there is no reason to doubt that they will try to do so in India but such a strategy will, of course, affect the digitally underprivileged adversely, since a machine with $200 software on it probably represents a couple of years of savings for the average person. The solution then is to encourage the use of open content and open-source software, and to contribute to the software and content.
'FREE' HARDWARE The solution could also involve free hardware, something that could piggyback onto the problem of e-Waste in the developing world. There are tens of millions of computers being discarded every year. According to estimates, the United States alone had about 41 million onsolete computers in 2001, with a projection of about 500 million units becoming obsolete in the period from 1997 to 2007. China discards around 5 million computers every year. The developed nations would probably be happy to have the computers taken off their junk yards, and garages, so that somebody can put them to use. This one is a win-win.
Saturday, July 24, 2004
I am watching a program on The Travel Channel on - get this - the World's 10 best Ancient Cultures still in existence today. Japan is number 9, India is number 8, and the entire continent of North America is at number 8. The concept of ranking cultures is quixotic, but oddly suspenseful. Papua New Guinea is at number 2, and I waited to see who was number 1. The envelope, please? And the winner is "Central Asia".
Meanwhile, here is Alok Rai in Outlook with a nice review of Amitav Ghosh's "The Hungry Tide", a story based on what is probably the world's best river delta.
Dreams come easy in this magic land. And part of what is at play in Nirmal's notebook is the contrast between the original utopian impulse that prompted the initial "colonial" settlements of the Sunderbans by Daniel Hamilton in the 1920s, and the subaltern-utopian motivation that underlay the appropriation of Marichjhapi island by doubly displaced Bangladeshis in 1979. Hamilton's is a sort of "Nehruvian" ambition, to make a place where people would shed their atavistic baggage of custom and prejudice and avail of the blessings of modernity.
Nature and bureaucracy - also a kind of Nature? - grind that into the mud, because of course there is little dust in the Sunderbans. Marichjhapi island was settled, briefly, by desperate refugees from the resettlement colony of Dandakaranya. The heroic and ineluctable community of these doubly-distressed Dalits was of little avail against the guns of the "leftist" government of Kolkata, deployed in defence of the "environment" but also, it is strongly implied, against subaltern presumption. Dreams are soon dead, too - in this nightmare land. Nirmal's quondam-leftist yearning for heroic, revolutionary transformation is contrasted with Nilima's modest "liberal" ambition to "make a few little things a little better in one small place... after all these years, it has amounted to something: it's helped people; it's made a few people's lives a little better. But that was never enough for Nirmal..."
Rightly or wrongly, when lending money to troubled economies, the IMF and the Bank attach conditions. After all, it is their job to make sure the money injected by their shareholders is not squandered by corrupt or incompetent governments.
On the one hand, retaining a significant amount of control in their investment allows these organizations to influence the creation and enforcement of strong laws and institutions, in the best tradition of macro economic principles, which will ensure that their funds are well spent.
However, on the other hand as the article states
There have been several instances where following the institutions' involvement, output and growth rates have fallen, unemployment has risen and the differences between rich and poor have grown. Critics say the conditions are often intrusive, excessive and inappropriate. And many, even among the world's elite, agree.
Due to highly differing legal, political, socio cultural, economic and environmental conditions in various countries, demands made by these IO’s cannot be generic, but must be tailored towards each specific country. Furthermore, not all conditions on a wish-list can be easily met across every country. An over-reliance on macro economic principles at the expense of socio-cultural, socio political and environmental conditions has sometimes led to contract clauses that are both stifling as well as almost impossible to achieve in the local environment.
There is also growing acceptance among shareholders that national governments should be the judges of their social and political priorities,
The call has therefore arisen for the IO’s to meddle less and act more as patrons. In fact the Delhi Metro Rail Corporation, currently engaged in building a subway rail system in Delhi, chose to be funded by the Japanese Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC) and NOT the World Bank, for exactly this reason.
The fundamental dilemma remains – What are the roles of these IO’s? What sort of structural reforms should be undertaken for them to be more effective? A strict enforcer based purely on macro economic principles at the expense of local institutional nuances is perhaps not the solution.
Thursday, July 22, 2004
Kitagawa engages in chilling conversation with indebted salarymen weighing the value of their continued existence vs. a life-insurance payout that would secure the financial future of their families. Says Kitagawa: "I try to tell them the children want their father, not the money."
This not so new BusinessWeek article focuses on the high suicide rates in Japan during the sluggish 90's. In a country where suicides were honorable ( The 'Complete Suicide Manual' was a best seller here), high suicide rates were only to be expected after the Asian finanical crisis. While the government tries to bring down these numbers, a potentially important instrument is the reforms of personal bankruptcy rules. The government has made the legal system faster and cheaper in an attempt to increase the numbers of 'effectively' bankrupt individuals to seek legal recourse. While culture remains an obstacle (to some extent the reforms are not attractive enough to overcome this), this has helped more people come forward.
Now shift to India, especially the south (kerala has one of the highest 'reported' suicide rates in the world) and west bengal, where personal bankruptcy rules are rigid and rarely used. Investigating potential reforms (along with changing attitudes on failures) might be useful, if not life saving.
Now both men and women - professionals, nonprofessionals and air guitarists alike - are being given a chance to put their best swoon-inducing faces on display. As a way to promote a video-on-demand guitar instruction show on cable television called "Guitar Xpress," the company that owns the service, Rainbow Media Holdings, recently came up with the idea of holding a national "guitar face" contest.
Pretenders to the throne of, say, Angus Young of AC/DC (among the widely acknowledged kings of extreme-pain guitar face) or Stevie Ray Vaughn (who patented a kind of uncontrolled hideous laughing look) or Eddie Van Halen (of the prolonged wide-open-mouth school) can take a picture of their own look and send it via e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org or mail it to the company, which has lined up a panel of celebrity guitarist judges including Dick Dale, Roger McGuinn and J. J. French of Twisted Sister. When the contest ends in October, the winner will end up with an Epiphone guitar, 15 or maybe even 20 seconds of fame and possibly calls from reality-show casting directors offering more.
Wednesday, July 21, 2004
The reasons have been discussed by several pundits. The inflexible labour market, unwieldy and stifling regulations, high wage costs, high taxes, an over-generous welfare state, demographics are all reasons quoted regularly in the media. Above all though, there is the cost to the Germany economy of reunification, which has really not worked out as planned. Reunification meant that overnight a nation was created with per capita incomes 13%-15% lower than in the former West Germany. And despite over $1.5 trillion being poured into the east since 1990, the high expectations from the time of reunification remains mostly unfulfilled. Mark Landler sheds more light on this in the NYT.
In its zeal to put the east on an equal footing with the west as fast as possible, the German government created a society addicted to welfare and other subsidies. The private sector withered, and by the mid-1990's the gap between east and west began to widen alarmingly. Now, with the jobless rate in some cities topping 20 percent and young people continuing to leave for the west, a national debate has begun over how to heal this limping land.The urgency is being driven in part by the eastward expansion of Europe, which has brought 10 new countries into the European Union. With their energetic workers and low wage levels, Poland, the Czech Republic and Hungary could further erode eastern Germany's position.
Having poured $1.5 trillion into the east since reunification in 1990, many Germans now regard this grand project as a costly failure - one that could drag down the rest of the country. "If we do not address eastern Germany, the financial burdens on Germany will become unbearable in the next 15 years," said Klaus von Dohnanyi, a former mayor of Hamburg. Mr. von Dohnanyi was chairman of a commission formed by the German government to draw up a blueprint for the east. The group submitted a bluntly worded report in June, recommending that the government direct the $110 billion a year it pours into eastern Germany away from public works projects like roads and bridges. Instead, the report said, it should support companies that might provide employment as well as promote research and education.
The reality is that eastern Germany does not need more public swimming pools or renovated apartment complexes. It needs more jobs, which would lure back the people who migrated to western Germany in search of work. The population of the five eastern states fell to 15.1 million in 2000, from 16.7 million in 1990.
Georg Milbradt, the prime minister of Saxony, said that Bavaria was able to reverse an exodus of people during the depressed 1950's by turning Munich into a center for the automotive and computer industries. Mr. Milbradt said the east can prosper only if it shakes off Germany's stifling labor regulations. That would drive down wages here and make the region competitive with its eastern neighbors. The trouble, he concedes, is that this would require the government to overhaul not just its policy toward the east, but its entire economic program.
I have two points to make. First, it is only natural that passengers in the US would be terrified of a bunch of Arabs with large hand bags making frequent trips to the toilets during a flight. However, what irks me is the clearly bigoted and racist views Jacobsen has chosen to air after she learned from authorities that these guys were musicians hired to play at a hotel. The article is rather long, so I've excerpted three paragraphs which I think are germane to the issue.
On June 29, 2004, at 12:28 pm, I flew on Northwest Airlines flight #327 from Detroit to Los Angeles with my husband and our young son. Also on our flight were 14 Middle Eastern men between the ages of approximately 20 and 50 years old. What I experienced during that flight has caused me to question whether the United States of America can realistically uphold the civil liberties of every individual, even non-citizens, and protect its citizens from terrorist threats.
As we sat waiting for the plane to finish boarding, we noticed another large group of Middle Eastern men boarding. The first man wore a dark suit and sunglasses. He sat in first class in seat 1A, the seat second-closest to the cockpit door. The other seven men walked into the coach cabin. As "aware" Americans, my husband and I exchanged glances, and then continued to get comfortable. I noticed some of the other passengers paying attention to the situation as well. As boarding continued, we watched as, one by one, most of the Middle Eastern men made eye contact with each other. They continued to look at each other and nod, as if they were all in agreement about something. I could tell that my husband was beginning to feel "anxious."
There were 14 Syrians on NWA flight #327. They were questioned at length by FAM, the FBI and the TSA upon landing in Los Angeles. The 14 Syrians had been hired as musicians to play at a casino in the desert. Adams said they were "scrubbed." None had arrest records (in America, I presume), none showed up on the FBI's "no fly" list or the FBI's Most Wanted Terrorists List. The men checked out and they were let go. According to Adams, the 14 men traveled on Northwest Airlines flight #327 using one-way tickets. Two days later they were scheduled to fly back on jetBlue from Long Beach, California to New York -- also using one-way tickets.
Tuesday, July 20, 2004
Wolf shows how trade and foreign direct investment are engines not of poverty but of wealth-creation; the problem for too many of the world's peasants and workers is not too much globalization but too little. There is a rich man's club of western nations that largely invest in and trade with each other, ratcheting up their incomes by specializing in what they are good at and exploiting their exponentially expanding stock of physical, human and intellectual capital. What the rest of the world wants and needs is not to resist this process but to share in more of the action itself - and those countries that join in on the right terms can do astonishingly well.
Wolf cites China as an example - in a way perhaps the most extraordinary convert to the principles in which he believes. China's economic growth is already the stuff of legend, and for those critics who accuse the country's export processing zones and burgeoning industrial belts of being new bywords for exploitation, Wolf has a ready reply: it was even worse living on the land on less than a dollar a day. Infant mortality has fallen dramatically; numeracy and literacy are rising sharply; food consumption is climbing. The 10 million peasants who leave the countryside every year looking for work in the cities are proof positive that they regard what is happening as an improvement - and one born of opening up to the very trade, investment and financial flows that the antiglobalisers decry.
The operative words in the extract above are 'on the right terms.' Globalization will not work, especially in India if it does not have proper political backing. Policymakers will have to arrive at a happy marriage between coalition partners and the economic needs of the nation. A case in point is FDI in the insurance sector in India. Just as P Chidambaram raised the stake in this sector from 26% to 49%, the Left rose up in arms (the Life Insurance Corporation of India has a strong and historically powerful trade union) and now the government is looking at a rollback. 'On the right terms' must mean both internal and external terms. This is something David Held argues for in his book, Global Covenant: The Social Democratic Alternative to the Washington Consensus.
David Held is a gold-carat social democrat and man of the liberal left, and intriguingly he begins his book with almost the same list of myths about globalization as Wolf and consigns them to the dustbin with no less enthusiasm. But while Wolf believes that globalization works, Held has profound reservations. It certainly has the potential to produce the opportunity and sustained wealth-generation in which Wolf believes - but only if the politics and governance are right. The argument migrates to new ground, where Wolf's certainties and mastery of economic data are less secure.
Held's position is that globalization is undermining national social settlements. Tensions between capital and labour, whose past resolution on a national basis led to social democratic bargains - legitimizing capitalism, promoting the rule of law and underwriting the circumstances and opportunities of ordinary people - are, he argues, re-emerging in the global framework. While Wolf can only explain the ability of totalitarian fascism and communism to check the last great beneficent, liberal global opening in the late 19th century as the triumph of bad ideas and power-grabbing authoritarians, Held is not puzzled at all. Rather he is worried that economic instability, inequality and palpable unfairness were recruiting-sergeants for massive political dissent, and that the only way to head them off now is to ensure that a global system of governance is developed on social democratic principles to govern globalization. He calls this a New Global Covenant.
I first heard the term 'semiotics' on account of a course on rhetoric taught by B. Subramanian at IIT Madras, in the context of Umberto Eco's "The Name of the Rose". I had never heard of semiotics before, much less of a professorship of semiotics. As Eco puts it, semiotics is 'the study of everything that can be taken as a sign'. You wonder if the dude deliberately uses the title of Professor of Semiotics just so that people will ask him what the heck it is.
Consider a country where traffic lights have the green light on top, amber next and red at the bottom (as opposed to the traditional red light on top). This should be fine as far as humans as concerned, but dogs are color-blind. If they are trained to watch the stack of lights from top to bottom, seeing-eye dogs are going to get fooled into waiting every time the light changes to green, and worse, cross the road along with the blind person as soon as the light changes to red. (Seeing-eye dogs are actually trained to watch the traffic, not the lights, so let us call these the 'stack of light' dogs). The elements of sensation are the same in both cases, But consider this : what is seen as a signfied in the environment has nothing to do with the environment itself. It has to do with the observer. The signs that the human reads in the environment are different from what the 'stack of light' dog reads in the exact same environment.
Many animals do not see in the same band of the spectrum as humans do. So, the world they see must be very different from the world we see. This is not limited to sight alone. The other senses are also similarly dissimilar.
John Deely, in this paper from Semiotica, talks about Uexkull's contribution to the field of semtiotics :
What Uexküll uniquely realized was that the physical environment, in whatever sense it may be said to be the ‘same’ for all organisms (we are speaking, of course, of the environment on earth, though much of what we say could be applied, mutatis mutandis, to biospheres on other planets should such eventually be found), is not the world in which any given species as such actually lives out its life. No. Each biological life-form, by reason of its distinctive bodily constitution (its ‘biological heritage’, as we may say), is suited only to certain parts and aspects of the vast physical universe. And when this ‘suitedness to’ takes the bodily form of cognitive organs, such as are our own senses, or the often quite different sensory modalities discovered in other lifeforms, then those aspects and only those aspects of the physical environment which are proportioned to those modalities become ‘objectified’, that is to say, made present not merely physically but cognitively as well.
He then uses the idea of different spectrums of vision to illustrate the idea of 'objects' in his example below, and to further, explain the concept of an Umwelt :
If my eyes are normal and a traditionally equipped classroom is lighted, I cannot fail to see the black rectangle against the lighter background that I will interpret as a blackboard affixed to a wall. But what my eyes objectify and what my mind makes of that vision remain as distinct as sensation as such in contrast to perception which alone transforms sensations into objects experienced, like dark rectangles against lighter surfaces ‘seen’ to be blackboards on walls.
Great logical exposition. I love the way Deely goes on about 'objects' and 'things', though. The dude has his moments of unintended humor.
Now there is a great difference between an object and a thing. For while the notion of thing is the notion of what is what it is regardless of whether it be known or not, the notion of object is hardly that.
Q : So, there is this thing called a thing, and this thing called an object?
A : No, an 'object' is different from a 'thing'.
Q : So, an object is not a thing?
A : The 'object' may or may not be a thing.
There is humor in that paper after all, but seriously, folks, the article is complex and scholarly, but it requires no previous background. It is certainly worth reading in full, just for John Deely's sheer brilliance of exposition, and especially if '[the term Umwelt] is destined (such is my guess) to become a term of general use in philosophy and intellectual culture.' I wouldn't bet on it, though :)
Folks, I have been threatening this for some time now -- to convert Zoo Station into a team blog in order to prevent lags in blogging when I am busy, to increase the diversity of content and so on. I had been talking to several people about the possibility of contributing to ZS on a regular basis and that process has resulted in this team blog. Joining me on Zoo Station today are...
Amit Chakrabarti -- Assistant Professor of Computer Science at Dartmouth
Ashwin Mahalingam -- Ph.D. candidate in Civil and Environmental Engineering at Stanford
Anand Manikutty -- Senior member of technical staff at Oracle
Vinay Nair -- Assistant Professor of Finance at the Wharton School at UPenn
Abraham Thomas -- Director of G7 trading at Simplex USA, a hedge fund in Princeton
Jaideep V.G. -- Editor-in-chief for Rave, the premier Indian entertainment magazine
Though the tone of ZS will probably remain the same, there will be a slight shift of focus as we look to concentrate more on India. This does not mean less international news and perspectives nor does it mean less entertainment, reviews etc. It simply means there will be more of India.
When I started this blog, I never expected it would last this long leave alone expecting it to transmogrify into a team blog. I hope the new bloggers on ZS will enjoy blogging on here as much as I have. You, dear reader, will almost certainly have better content at your disposal from today. Enjoy.
In this vitriolic piece, Lynn Barber writes about visiting The Theatre and coming away bored, wanting to watch TV.
You can go to the cinema and just think, 'Oh well, that was a bad movie', but the theatre induces this awful feeling of complicity in failure. And, of course, however bad you feel walking into a theatre, you feel a damn sight worse once the curtain goes up.
My first outing was to The Woman in Black. Now this, I must admit, was a mistake. I thought it was a new musical by Andrew Lloyd Webber which Michael Winner told me he'd seen at the composer's country house, Sydmonton Court, and which was brilliant. So I felt rather smug about getting tickets before the press night. Unfortunately the Lloyd Webber musical is called The Woman in White. The Woman in Black is a very creaky old ghost story that has been on for l5 years. It boasts of being 'the new Mousetrap ' which is a bit like boasting of being the new Terry Wogan or the new Mateus Rosé.
OK, I agree, The Woman in Black was a mistake. Whereas my next play - Democracy - is one that everyone assures me I will love. And it is by Michael Frayn which leads me to believe (completely erroneously) that it will be funny. Instead, it is about Chancellor Willy Brandt and seems to consist of a lecture on postwar German politics given by a lot of interchangeable middle-aged men in suits. The audience listen attentively, reverently even - perhaps they are all planning to sit exams on German politics tomorrow? Once in a while they erupt in that special laugh you only ever hear in theatres - a laugh that has absolutely nothing to do with finding something funny and everything to do with a desire to signal: 'Yes, yes, I get the joke!' Admittedly the actors have to do a lot of mumming and miming to indicate where these 'knowing' laughs are supposed to occur, but they don't seem to mind doing it. Meanwhile I am trapped with my knees round my ears, wondering if it is possible to die of deep vein thrombosis from sitting in a theatre. Minutes turn to hours, hours to weeks, weeks to years. Outside the theatre, ice ages come and go, tectonic plates shift, mountains erode, new continents are formed - it is the longest evening of my life.
Monday, July 19, 2004
Throw India into that mix and it does seem like MS will need to do something quick to establish a foothold in the two largest emerging economies. During my stay in India, I saw many, many more commercials in the newspapers for both laptops and desktops with Linux on-board than I have ever seen in the United States. In addition, most of India's home computer market is grey in colour and pirated software is the order of the day. Under the circumstances, what is Microsoft to do? Newsweek throws some light.
Microsoft doesn't break down its China numbers, but Beijing tech analyst Huang Yong estimates that the company is in fact losing money in China on yearly revenue of $200 million to $300 million (out of $35 billion worldwide).
For Microsoft, the problem with doing business in China comes down mainly to one thing: piracy. Touts line the street outside a new $80 million Microsoft research center in Beijing, steering customers through alleys to run-down apartments where bootleg copies of Microsoft Office and Word are peddled for about $1, at least $199 less than the global retail price. Ninety percent of Microsoft products used in China are pirated, and for years the company battled back with its signature mix of bullying and intimidation. But in China the government has been sympathetic to the pirates, openly hostile to the Microsoft monopoly and officially embraced Linux, the free rival to Windows. Cheap software has been critical to China's economic boom, and Beijing saw no upside to forcing citizens with an average annual income of $1,000 to spend much of it on Windows.
The new Microsoft China strategy attempts to create a constituency for full-price software, starting with the political and business elite. This means improving customer support for big Chinese companies, helping Beijing develop a domestic software industry trained on and tied to Microsoft products, sharing more technology than it normally would and easing up on buyers of pirated software (but not on pirates).
To me, the central problem seems fairly straight-forward -- MS is trying to sell $200 software in a country where the per-capita annual income is about $1,000 (they refuse to bring prices down). Look guys, software is a high fixed-cost, low-marginal cost business. So, price discrimination seems like the only trick that will work in China and India, if you want to have a realistic chance of fighting off the pirates and Linux. I dont know what an ideal price point in China would be, but I can guarantee that at $200+, most sane people (in India and China) are not going to bite, especially since real alternatives exist. The Windows OS for $10 perhaps? Office for another $10?
Sunday, July 18, 2004
There are serious lessons India can learn from Shanghai's predicament. After all, 38 celsius may be bloody hot in Shanghai, but its just a pleasant summer's day in Delhi (where temperatures go over 45 celsius fairly frequently). And China has a real winter, unlike most parts of peninsular India. So, it would probably help if planners start thinking of encouraging the building of energy-efficient "green" buildings to avoid massive power-cuts, electricity rationing and so on. To that extent, it is great news that the world's greenest building is now in Hyderabad. It would also help to spend some research dollars on innovative new means of captive power generation. Captive hydel power generation anyone?
Saturday, July 17, 2004
So much of today's contentious immigration debate focuses on those arriving from Latin America to work in agriculture or take low-level service jobs that Americans tend to spurn. But a new study by Stuart Anderson of the National Foundation for American Policy reminds us that the contributions of skilled foreign-born professionals and their offspring are no less important to the U.S. Without them the country would be hard pressed to maintain its world-wide advantage in such fields as math and science.
The report, titled "The Multiplier Effect," will be released on Monday and available at www.nfap.net. Here are some highlights:
-- More than half of the engineers with Ph.D.s working in the U.S., and 45% of the nation's computer science doctorates, are foreign-born.
-- Children of immigrants comprise 65% of the 2004 U.S. Math Olympiad's top scorers (13 of 20) and 46% of the U.S. Physics Team (11 of 24).
-- At this year's Intel Science Talent Search, which recognizes the nation's top math and science students, 60% of the finalists and seven of the top 10 award winners were immigrants or their children. Last year, three of the top four awardees were foreign-born.
While the whiz kids and their parents hail from nations as far-flung as India, Romania, China, Vietnam, Israel, Turkey and Russia, many are here on a very limited number of H-1b visas that are reserved for immigrants with technical skills. These visas are given out to fewer than 100,000 foreigners each year, which is less than .04% of the 293 million individuals who live in the U.S.
At the same time these findings help illustrate that our economy benefits substantially from immigration, in particular from H-1b visa recipients and their children. Any policy that would depress the influx or close off our borders altogether is not in America's long-term interest, especially in a world where economic growth and competitiveness will depend above all on human capital. If we had listened to the anti-immigration crowd over the past 20 years, says Mr. Anderson in an interview, "we would have wiped out two-thirds of the top future scientist and mathematicians in the United States because we would have barred their parents from ever entering America."
When it Falls is Zero 7's second album and it proves that "Simple Things" was no fluke. With its chillout meets electronica meets downtempo meets trip-hop meets acid-jazz meets soul feel, this is one of the best albums I have listened to this year. In particular, check out the title track, which really gives trippy music a very good name indeed. Forget what the reviewers are saying (and most of it is good) and go listen for yourself.
PS: As an aside, a track of the new album "Somersault" was the 100 millionth download at the Itunes website.
PPS: If you want to test-drive Zero 7 before you buy, you could either download Destiny for free or watch a bunch of free videos here.
He has become a member of a cosmopolitan village that has formed as multinational companies flock here, and Indian companies try to become multinationals. The city is full of foreigners - 10,000 to 12,000 are registered here with the government's office of foreign registration. At some bars, the crowds are so mixed they look as if they could be in London. The foreigners are staffing multinational companies and filling five-star hotels to overflowing. Those here for longer stints are living in exclusive housing complexes, and international schools are springing up for their children.
Few Americans are among them, even though previous generations of young American graduates have pursued literary careers in Paris or tried to take capitalism and democracy to Russia and Eastern Europe. India would seem a logical next choice, given an economy that grew by 8.2 percent last year, a software and services sector that grew by 28 percent last year and the way outsourcing is rewriting the rules of the American and the global economy.
Yes, its a soft profile, but still worth reading to get an idea of the sort of changes that are taking places in at least three cities I have visited in the recent past -- Bombay, Bangalore and Hyderabad. I presume Delhi belongs in the same category too, though I cannot be sure.
Friday, July 16, 2004
The most productive bus systems have drivers at the steering wheel for up to 95 percent of their working hours; meanwhile, many subway and commuter rail operators struggle to deploy drivers for more than half of the time they are at work. Driver utilization rates can fall dramatically if routes and round trips keep drivers idle during significant parts of the workday or don't take account of the time required for mandatory breaks or of the fact that drivers must check their vehicles at the start of each shift. In many cases, it is utilization, rather than wages, that represents the greater improvement opportunity.
Best-practice operators have increased utilization levels through measures such as better overtime management and dynamic staffing (deploying drivers in full- and part-time shifts according to real-time analysis of passenger demand). Other transit agencies have improved utilization levels by taking simpler steps, such as splitting shifts into two four-hour periods to cover the rush hours, with an unpaid break during the day, and cross- training maintenance and clerical workers so that they can drive trains and buses during unexpected spikes in demand.
In maintenance, the challenge is threefold: to improve labor productivity, to define the right maintenance schedule, and to prevent every transit operator's nightmare—breakdowns. To avoid the disruptions they cause, many operators keep extra vehicles and staff standing by, an extremely expensive insurance policy. One North American bus operator with a poor maintenance strategy is so plagued by frequent breakdowns that it keeps nearly 500 extra buses, worth a total of $125 million, either in the shop being serviced or sitting in depots waiting to replace the next breakdown.
Best-practice agencies understand that decisions about a vehicle's operations—which routes it runs, how often, and when—must be coordinated with, and should help to define, the maintenance schedule. They also mine operational and maintenance data to predict replacement cycles for specific components (such as brakes and doors) and schedule maintenance during off-peak times at night or on weekends to minimize conflicts with passenger service. One European rail operator has mined these data so successfully that it has reduced its spare ratio (the number of vehicles kept on standby) virtually to zero during peak hours by improving the reliability of its vehicles. If the most poorly maintained fleets reached average levels, the operators should be able to increase their fleet utilization levels and cut their maintenance costs by more than half.
Paper tickets and monthly passes are relatively inexpensive to issue but require significant station and onboard labor, which for some operators can represent more than $1 a ride. Systems that control access to platforms (by using turnstiles or other barriers to collect fares through tokens, cash, or magnetic cards) must have capital for ticket-vending machines and barriers but require little or no onboard labor. Those using self-validation (or "honor") systems, in which passengers carry proof of payment throughout the journey, can use fewer conductors onboard but need the legal authority to impose stiff fines during spot checks.
Some agencies have deployed new smart-card technologies that can improve service significantly. Hong Kong's Octopus card allows passengers to change modes seamlessly (from bus to rail to subway to ferry), makes it possible to collect passenger data that can be used to improve customer service and to plan routes as well as to develop customer-relationship-management opportunities such as targeted discounts and automatic debit services to replenish fares. Where smart cards are not feasible in the short term, self-validation systems offer a reasonable alternative: they reduce onboard labor costs by 30 to 40 percent and, in Europe at least, have surprisingly resulted in less revenue leakage than many operators initially feared.
While health care facilities have grown substantially since the 1990s, they are mostly in the private sector – often beyond the reach of the poor. According to the Central Bureau of Health Intelligence at the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, the private sector accounted for 57 percent of the 11,174 hospitals that existed in 1991. In 2000, however, the proportion of privately-run hospitals grew to 75 percent of a total of 18,218 hospitals.
Only 17 percent of all health expenditure is borne by the government, which makes India’s health sector one of the most privatised in the world. The World Health Organization standard for expenditure on public health is five percent of GDP. India’s 0.9 percent expenditure of GDP is less than the average for poor countries – 2.8 percent. Some critics say India’s health took a knock in the 1990s – the era of economic liberalisation, when stagnant public health budgets and decreasing government expenditure in public health facilities were worsened by the introduction of user fees at various levels of public health facilities.
The piece also has details on the three-by-initiative announced by the previous NDA govt specifically to provide access to ARV drugs.
After the Three by Five initiative the then health minister Sushma Swaraj declared a strong policy-cum-programme commitment to provide free ARV treatment to 100,000 AIDS patients. This began in April 2004. Government hospitals were to provide treatment in six high-prevalence states, and within them to three vulnerable groups: HIV-positive mothers; HIV-positive children below the age of 15 years; and AIDS patients who seek treatment in government hospitals. The number of patients who had received ARV treatment till June 10 was 874.
Not a very successful program, is it?
Current official estimates are that there are 5.09 million HIV-infected people in India – up from 3.58 million in 1998, 3.72m (1999), 3.86m (2000), 3.97m (2001) and 4.58m (2002). “These figures are a cause of increasing concern to the government because people infected with HIV during the 1980s and 1990s will progress to AIDS, resulting in a steep increase in the number of AIDS patients,” admits Datta Ghosh. Today access to treatment has become the subject of a major debate in India, fuelled by a public interest litigation filed in India’s highest court last August demanding treatment for HIV/AIDS patients and provision of infrastructure.
Shruti Pandey, a lawyer working for the human rights group that filed the petition, says: “Our principle prayer was that the government should provide ARVs within the public health system and create an infrastructure, as sticking to the regimen is important.” But the government’s position, Pandey says, is ambiguous: “It has not spelt out measures on how it plans to maintain confidentiality and manage toxicity (of drugs) and neither is it clear on how they plan to raise the resources.” “Where are the attempts to build a conducive atmosphere for AIDS patients?” asks Pandey. “Everyday, we hear of some instance of discrimination against HIV-positive people. They are being treated like untouchables. Their right to employment is being denied and the orphaned children are not given any support.”
These are urgent questions in India, which, along with China, is expected to emerge as the biggest Asian AIDS hot-spot in the coming years.“Ninetyfive per cent of people with AIDS are poor, and most of them do not even know about the first line regimen,” says Ricki Tombing from the state of Manipur – one of the six focus states in the government’s AIDS strategy.
In this seemingly bleak situation, any attention that the UPA govt manages to focus on public health is better than none at all. Here's hoping.
"The Web isn't just a sales outlet, it's much more akin to a vast public library," said Aaron Swartz, who coded the Times' link generator, which enables bloggers to get around the Times' paid archive by transforming temporary article links into permanent ones, so that its articles don't expire in a week. "A far more sensible position for the Times would be to charge for new news, not old news. Can you imagine the possibilities if it opened up its archive?"
Swartz has a point. Behind its firewall, the Times houses a newspaper archive dating back to 1996, complete with photos and graphics, and occasional multimedia features with movies and animation. If it were made available, "weblogs could thoroughly compare modern political coverage with coverage from 1996 or 2000," Swartz said. They could "see which Times predictions were right and wrong, and reread with hindsight the coverage of the dot-com boom and bust." The permanence of its reporting and extension of its brand name in cyberspace would more than compensate for the paltry amount of money it would lose from its paid archive.
Wednesday, July 14, 2004
I personally think groupthink is a refined, if far more dangerous version of mob mentality. The truth is often obscured when a bunch of people, conditioned to think in the fashion that suits their overlords, repeat a lie so many times, it becomes the truth. Before the excerpt from the op-ed piece, here are a few very relevant lines from a poem by one of my favorite poets - Wilfred Owen.
If in some smothering dreams you too could pace
Behind the wagon that we flung him in,
And watch the white eyes writhing in his face,
His hanging face, like a devil's sick of sin;
If you could hear, at every jolt, the blood
Come gargling from the froth-corrupted lungs,
Obscene as cancer, bitter as the cud
Of vile, incurable sores on innocent tongues,---
My friend, you would not tell with such high zest
To children ardent for some desperate glory,
The old Lie: Dulce et decorum est
Pro patria mori.
(the last line is by Horace and translates as 'It is sweet and honorable to die for one's country')
I trace the current outbreak of droidlike conformity to the immediate aftermath of 9/11, when groupthink became the official substitute for patriotism, and we began to run out of surfaces for affixing American flags. Bill Maher lost his job for pointing out that, whatever else they were, the 9/11 terrorists weren't cowards, prompting Ari Fleischer to warn (though he has since backed down) that Americans "need to watch what they say." Never mind that Sun Tzu says, somewhere in his oeuvre, that while it's soothing to underestimate the enemy, it's often fatal, too.
And what was that group thinking in Abu Ghraib? Yes, the accused guards seem to have been encouraged to soften up their charges for interrogation, just as the operatives at Langley were pelted with White House demands for some plausible casus belli. But the alarming thing is how few soldiers demurred, and how many got caught up in the fun of it.
Societies throughout history have recognized the hazards of groupthink and made arrangements to guard against it. The shaman, the wise woman and similar figures all represent institutionalized outlets for alternative points of view. In the European carnival tradition, a "king of fools" was permitted to mock the authorities, at least for a day or two. In some cultures, people resorted to vision quests or hallucinogens - anything to get out of the box. Because, while the capacity for groupthink is an endearing part of our legacy as social animals, it's also a common precondition for self-destruction. One thousand coalition soldiers have died because the C.I.A. was so eager to go along with the emperor's delusion that he was actually wearing clothes.
Trade is only one element in a much bigger picture of incessant turnover in the American labor market. Furthermore, the overall trend is toward more and better jobs for American workers. While job losses are real and sometimes very painful, it is important -- indeed, for the formulation of sound public policy, it is vital -- to distinguish between the painful aspects of progress and outright decline.
Toward that end, and to counter protectionist "analysis" masquerading as fact, here are 10 core truths about global trade and American jobs.
1. The Number of Jobs Grows With the Population
2. Jobs Churn Constantly
3. Challenging, High-Paying Jobs Are Becoming More Plentiful, Not Less
4. "Deindustrialization" Is a Myth
5. Imports Have Not Been a Major Cause of Recent Manufacturing Job Losses
6. "Offshoring" Is Not a Threat to High-Tech Employment
7. Globalization of Services Creates Enormous Opportunity for American Industry
8. Offshoring Creates New Jobs and Boosts Economic Growth
9. The Digital Revolution Has Been Eliminating White-Collar Jobs for Many Years
10. Fears That the U.S. Economy Is Running Out of Jobs Are Nothing New