<$BlogRSDUrl$>

Sunday, November 14, 2004

The L word 

One of the things that amazes me about America is that in a country that was founded as a liberal democracy, the word 'liberal' has become an insult from which you can barely recover. I am reminded of John Kerry, a good liberal, having to remind voters of his supposed conservative values (and kill a few small animals/birds to drive the point home). That is just beyond ridiculous. Being a liberal is something most right-thinking people should be proud of, including Americans. After all, the idea behind the middle-east project, which all the liberal-haters claim to support, is to spread the values of liberalism and democracy, right?

The Economist, a magazine that prides itself on being liberal, is befuddled by the negative connotation of the word in both continental Europe and the United States and would like to claim it back.

in continental Europe, as in the United States, liberalism is also regarded as a perversion, a pathology: there is consistency in that respect, even though the sickness takes such different forms. And again, in its most extreme expression, it tests the boundaries of tolerance. Worse than ordinary liberals are Europe's neoliberals: market-worshipping, nihilistic sociopaths to a man. Many are said to believe that “there is no such thing as society.”

Yet there ought to be a word—not to mention, here and there, a political party—to stand for what liberalism used to mean. The idea, with its roots in English and Scottish political philosophy of the 18th century, speaks up for individual rights and freedoms, and challenges over-mighty government and other forms of power. In that sense, traditional English liberalism favoured small government—but, crucially, it viewed a government's efforts to legislate religion and personal morality as sceptically as it regarded the attempt to regulate trade (the favoured economic intervention of the age).

We do not want Republicans and Democrats, socialists and conservatives all demanding to be recognised as liberals (even though they should want to be). That would be too confusing. Better to hand “liberal” back to its original owner. For the use of the right, we therefore recommend the following insults: leftist, statist, collectivist, socialist. For the use of the left: conservative, neoconservative, far-right extremist and apologist for capitalism. That will free “liberal” to be used exclusively from now on in its proper sense, as we shall continue to use it regardless. All we need now is the political party.